| | Roxen Community: RFC 1793 Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits (Standards Track) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13) |
 | | Even though a circuit's data-link connection may be closed at any particular time, it is assumed by the routing layer (i.e., OSPF) that the circuit is available unless other information, such as a discouraging diagnostic code resulting from an attempted data-link connection, is present. |
 | | For demand circuits, this event should be mapped into the "discouraging diagnostic code" discussed previously in Section 1, and should not be generated when the data-link connection has been closed simply to save resources. |
 | | Because the basic properties of the demand circuit functionality were presented in the previous example, this example will only address the unique issues involved when using both demand and non-demand circuits in parallel. |
| community.roxen.com /developers/idocs/rfc/rfc1793.html (8746 words) |