| |
| | Anatomy of a Revolution in the Social Sciences |
 | | Yet the absence of the term in accounts of transformational theory by Chomsky's followers during the 1960s and 1970s does not imply their rejection of the (frequently distorted) use of the Kuhnian morphology of scientific revolutions. |
 | | We have mentioned the question of funding, which Newmeyer (1980:52 and n.8) has reduced to a few lines in a 250-page account of the first 25 years (1955-1980) of TGG, but which, I believe, was of distinct importance in the furtherance of the transformationalist cause. |
 | | It was in the publications and, in particular, in the public debates of the followers of TGG that the rhetoric of revolution, the claim to novelty, 'creativity', and originality, came to the fore, coupled with the claim of a lack of comprehension and support on the part of the older generation of linguists. |
| www.tlg.uci.edu /~opoudjis/Work/KK.html (5338 words) |
|