| |
| | Paradox Interactive Forums - Historical Treaty of Nerchinsk |
 | | The treaty didnt, according to the current version, secede Manchuria to China, as Manchuria was in firm control by Qing at that time, which was at a position of tremendous strength at that time, only just having conquered China from Manchuria 40 odd years ago. |
 | | In 1689, a Russo-Chinese border conflict was settled by the first Chinese-European agreement, the Treaty of Nerchinsk, wherein it was recognised that the Amur basin laid within Chinese borders while the Baikal Lake region belonged to Russia. |
 | | And if Russia is extremely strong, then we should reverse the options so the AI would most likely reject the second version of the treaty, and this would be the most extreme we should go, bcos a treaty purporting to secede provinces in the Amur region to Russia would not be realistic. |
| www.europa-universalis.com /forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=49952 (3014 words) |
|