| |
| | A mathematician's apology |
 | | The trivial mathematics may be justified by arguments which would appeal to Hogben, or other writers of his school, but there is no such defence for the real mathematics, which must be justified as art if it can be justified at all. |
 | | We have concluded that the trivial mathematics is, on the whole, useful, and that the real mathematics, on the whole, is not; that the trivial mathematics does, and that the real mathematics does not, ‘do good’ in a certain sense; but we have still to ask whether either sort of mathematics does harm. |
 | | It is true that there are branches of applied mathematics, such as ballistics and aerodynamics, which have been developed deliberately for war and demand a quite elaborate technique: it is perhaps hard to call them ‘trivial’, but none of them has any claim to rank as ‘real’. |
| mywebpage.netscape.com /jaimecarvalho/485/Hardy.htm (605 words) |
|