| |
| | [KS] re: Tsushima/Taema-do |
 | | My view, though, is that Tsushima was not a Korean tributary, because its relationship with the island also provided a relationship with Japan proper, and in fact the latter was a particular goal of both the KoryO and ChosOn governments. |
 | | Remember that the normalization of 1443 was negotiated in Japan with the Ashikaga shogunate, not on Tsushima with the daimyo^, although he was a party on the Japan side. |
 | | If you think that the "ChosOn government treated the island as Korean territory," I would welcome a discussion of the details of this treatment, specifically, how that treatment concretely operated on Tsushima, and what is the definition of "territory" for purposes of this discussion. |
| www.koreaweb.ws /pipermail/koreanstudies_koreaweb.ws/1998-October/000975.html (1608 words) |
|