
	Where results make sense

Topic: UnLamda programming language

Related Topics

List of esoteric programming languages

Esoteric programming language

Lazy K

Lisp programming language

Church integer

Befunge

Perl

Iota and Jot

Turing tarpit

Iota and Jot programming languages

In the News (Thu 10 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Unlambda - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Unlambda is a minimal functional programming language invented by David Madore.
		As an esoteric programming language, Unlambda is meant as a demonstration of very pure functional programming rather than for practical use.
		is applied to x, the execution of the program is terminated, and x is taken as the result of the program (most of the currently existing interpreters ignore the result anyway).
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/UnLamda_programming_language (623 words)

	Programming language/Talk - Wikipedia
		The only entries that presently use "lang language" are C (fixed now) and Ruby, so I am going to do what I can to make them work right and also what I can to make all the ambiguous ones work right with "lang programming language".
		Euphoria -- Euphoria language -- Euphoria programming language
		Pascal -- Pascal language -- Pascal programming language
	nostalgia.wikipedia.org /wiki/Programming_language/Talk (828 words)

	Encyclopedia: Perl (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
		The C Programming Language, Brian Kernighan and Dennis Ritchie, the original edition that served for many years as an informal specification of the language The C programming language is a standardized imperative computer programming language developed in the early 1970s by Dennis Ritchie for use on the Unix operating system.
		The overall structure of Perl derives broadly from the programming language C. Perl is a procedural programming language, with variables, expressions, assignment statements, brace-delimited code blocks, control structures, and subroutines.
		Scheme APL (for A Programming Language, or sometimes Array Processing Language) is an array programming language based on a notation invented in 1957 by Kenneth E. Iverson while at Harvard University.
	www.nationmaster.com /encyclopedia/Perl (9249 words)

	Talk:List of programming languages - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		The question whether HTML (etc.) is (are) (a) programming language(s) has made for a number of arguments in the past, and there are really no clear enough definitions of what a programming language is and isn't (or should and shouldn't be), and where the domain of programming languages ends and that of mark-up languages begins.
		Dictionary.com's definition of a programming language is "An artificial language used to write instructions that can be translated into machine language and then executed by a computer." I do not believe that this definition is met by markup languages- as they do not cause the instructions of any machine language themselves.
		What, we don't want to eat in our own restaurant? :-) Programming language characterizes it as a means of instructing a computer in how to perform a computation, which is correctly vague.
	www.wikipedia.org /wiki/Talk:List_of_programming_languages (3820 words)

	unlamda programming language (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
		Unlambda is a minimal functional programming language based upon the lambda calculus but not supporting the lambda operator.
		It relies mainly on two builtin functions (s and k) and an "Apply" operator (written `, the backquote character); these alone make it Turing-complete, but there are also some I/O functions to make it possible to interact with the user, some shortcut functions and a function for lazy evaluation.
		The hello, world program in Unlambda is somewhat odd.
	www.yourencyclopedia.net /UnLamda_programming_language.html (214 words)

	Talk:Programming language - InfoSearchPoint.com (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
		For those dialects/spin-offs/implementations/ports of programming languages that are never going to be more than a single-sentence article: assemble on the page of the main article (BASIC programming language here) and make a section where you mention this or, when this is getting a long list, make it a separate article.
		The primary distinction between markup and programming languages is one of emphasis.
		It's true that a function in a programming language is not the same thing as a function in pure math, but the notation ought to be familiar enough.
	www.infosearchpoint.com /display/Talk:Programming_language (4936 words)

	Re: Helpful Practical Uses of Conditional Assembly
		Malbogle, Unlamda and Whitespace) are both impossible to learn and to use by humans.
		I therefore conclude that 'g' is not a function of 'f' and that the ease of leaning a language (and thus its programming methodology) is not releated to its ease of use.
		The learnability and usability of a language are difficult to quantify without studies and statistical analysis of the results.
	www.talkaboutprogramming.com /group/alt.lang.asm/messages/66880.html (586 words)

	The Unlambda Programming Language
		Intercal remains the archetype of the Obfuscated Programming Language.
		If the underlying language does not have first-class functions, then they must be emulated by means of data structures (indeed, the only “variable” part in a first-class function is its closure, and that can be represented by a data structure, since the code is always the same).
		As in any language having first-class (higher-order) functions, and, therefore, escaping closures, the lifetime of the various structures is not statically determined in Unlambda, and some kind of automatic memory management (aka “garbage collection”) is necessary.
	www.madore.org /~david/programs/unlambda (7293 words)

	[No title]
		Assuming it passes that test, and programs appear to behave themselves when written in it, you can be pretty sure if it's safety.
		If it was a document, not a web-browser-control language (in my not so very humble opinion nothing but me has the right to control my web browser), you wouldn't have that problem.
		Naa, it was a language that started out as just some OO extentions to C (Objective C did this right).
	www2.tunes.org /~nef/logs/osdev/05.06.09 (8280 words)

	Search logs: #osdev - 9 June 2005
		Should be able to do it in a functional language, then write the translator for the OO one in that...
		You'd have to think about it in a different, non-automated way with C/C++, but you could create a program that would compile to the same result as one created with a language with proper proofs.
		I suspect the main problem is with running a scripting language on top of a emulator, which seems quite nonsensical when a interpreter would do just fine (Perl is WORLDS faster).
	tunes.org /~qz/search?view=1&c=osdev&y=5&m=6&d=9 (9486 words)

	[No title]
		A [] appearing in a program should be of _one_ type, I think.
		eg when running the program let a = [] in 'c', a remains polymorphic (type [a]) at the end of the typechecking phase.
		I always wanted to design a PLCC to execute Jot programs, then set it running on all possible ones, eventually converging (at infinity) to the value of omega.
	bespin.org /~nef/logs/haskell/05.04.25 (15069 words)

	learn french in france (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02)
		Age de terre, age de pierre, poterie de la Guyane et des Antilles francaises.
		Galway resources hour making better bbsi pronunciation foreign language alliance francaises french courses, tefl school spanish training studying courses tefl lympstone galway rosetta stone iatefl...
		Un Un-American activities Un-schooling Un242 UnLamda programming language Un...
	learnfrenchinfrance.molalearn.com /alliancefrancaises (711 words)

	[No title]
		- but if you've been doing a lot of coding in a typed language it is sometimes more helpful to believe that the type is a fundamental property of a value (since you can do all sorts of type class things to distinguish 'equal' values of different types)
		- A [] appearing in a program should be of _one_ type, I think.
		- eg when running the program let a = [] in 'c', a remains polymorphic (type [a]) at the end of the typechecking phase.
	www.aboutrealstuff.com /arc/fr/haskell/00117.htm (10832 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)