| |
| | SHEPARD v. UNITED STATES, 544 U.S. --- -- US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez |
 | | United States, 495 U., and that a court sentencing under the ACCA can look to statutory elements, charging documents, and jury instructions to determine whether an earlier conviction after a jury trial was for generic burglary in States (like Massachusetts) with broader burglary definitions, id., at 602. |
 | | The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. |
 | | United States, 495 U. (1990), that the statute's use of the term "burglary" was meant to encompass only what we described as "generic" burglary, a crime with three elements: (i) "unlawful or unprivileged entry into, or remaining in," (ii) "a building or structure," (iii) "with intent to commit a crime." Id. |
| supreme.justia.com /us/544/03-9168/case.html (7253 words) |
|