Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: United States Court of International Trade


Related Topics

In the News (Tue 29 Dec 09)

  
  United States court of appeals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
There currently are thirteen United States courts of appeals, although there are other tribunals (such as the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which hears appeals in court-martial cases) that have "Court of Appeals" in their titles.
Although the courts of appeals are frequently referred to as "circuit courts," they should not be confused with the historical United States circuit courts, which existed from 1789 to 1911 and were primarily trial courts.
When a court of appeals was created for the District of Columbia in 1893, it was named the “Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia”, and it was renamed to the “United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia” in 1934.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/United_States_court_of_appeals   (935 words)

  
 United States Court of International Trade - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For example, the Court hears disputes such as those involving protests before the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, decisions regarding Trade Adjustment Assistance by the United States Department of Labor or United States Department of Agriculture, customs broker licensing, and disputes relating to agency determinations regarding antidumping and countervailing duties.
Appeals from the Court of International Trade are heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Further appeals from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit are heard by the United States Supreme Court.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/United_States_Court_of_International_Trade   (394 words)

  
 Reference.com/Encyclopedia/United States district court
All United States district courts are named in the format "United States District Court for the XXXX District of XXXX," with the exception of the United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands.
U.S. District Court for the District of Guam
U.S. District Court for the District of Iowa
www.reference.com /browse/wiki/Federal_district_court   (2773 words)

  
 No. 01-684: CIT v. United States - Opposition
SDO appealed the ITA's decision to the United States Court of International Trade (CIT), and the case was assigned to Judge Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr.
The court stated that "[i]f the result of this remand is not initiation of [a] preliminary investigation[] * * *, the written reasons therefor are to be filed with the court on or before the close of the aforesaid 60-day period." Id. at 61a.
In the circumstances of the present case, moreover, it is particularly appropriate to regard the court of appeals' issuance of mandamus relief as being "in aid of" that court's jurisdiction.
www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/2001/0responses/2001-0684.resp.html   (5240 words)

  
 [No title]
United States, 319 U.S. (1943), the court of appeals concluded, however, that "(a)n action against the government * * * is not a suit at common law within the purview of the Seventh Amendment" (Pet.
United States, 102 U.S. As this Court observed in Galloway v.
United States, 319 U.S. at 388-389 (footnote omitted)): The suit is one to enforce a monetary claim against the United States.
www.usdoj.gov /osg/briefs/1988/sg880065.txt   (2597 words)

  
 [No title]
Australia agrees with the United States that the Panel's interpretation of "unjustifiable discrimination" is based on an incorrect interpretation and application of the object and purpose of the WTO Agreement in construing the GATT 1994.
Furthermore, according to the United States, the appellees' allegation of prejudice was unfounded.
The United States argues: In context, an alleged “discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail” is not “unjustifiable” where the policy goal of the Article XX exception being applied provides a rationale for the justification.
www.wto.org /English/tratop_e/dispu_e/58abr.doc   (13451 words)

  
 [No title]
Indeed, stating that its “argument is squarely precluded by [the] panel ruling in [IBM] such that proceedings before a panel would be futile,” Sony petitioned for initial en banc hearing of this appeal, to allow for reconsideration of the holdings in IBM and U.S. Shoe.
For all of these reasons, we do not refer this case to the full court for an en banc poll, and, as it must be under the holdings in IBM and U.S. Shoe, the judgment of the Court of International Trade is AFFIRMED.
On October 24, 2003, at the request of the court, the defendant United States submitted a response.
www.fedcir.gov /opinions/02-1485.doc   (1024 words)

  
 James Lopez Watson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Because judges of that court are periodically assigned to federal courts around the country, Judge Watson became the first African-American judge to head a federal court in the South since Reconstruction.
He took senior status in 1991, but continued to serve on the court until his death from cancer in 2001.
In 2003 the courthouse at 1 Federal Plaza in Manhattan was renamed the “James L. Watson United States Court of International Trade Building” in his honor.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/James_Lopez_Watson   (235 words)

  
 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (from United States government) --  Britannica Student Encyclopedia
court established by act of Congress of October 1, 1982, to handle cases in which the United States or any of its branches, departments, or agencies is a defendant.
The courts, which exercise both criminal and civil jurisdiction, are based in 94 judicial districts throughout the United States.
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
www.britannica.com /ebi/article-209679   (972 words)

  
 Precision in Protests Required
However, the United States Court of International Trade and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have reaffirmed that a certain amount of care is necessary when drafting a protest under Section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. §1514.
However, once the law suit was commenced in the Court of International Trade, the Court held that the protest was invalid since it did not comport with the provisions of 19 U.S.C. § 1514; and, therefore, the Court did not have jurisdiction over the action.
Following dismissal of the case, Koike sought to have the Court of International Trade's decision overturned and appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
library.findlaw.com /2000/Feb/1/129401.html   (839 words)

  
 The Spotlight Issue 308, July 8, 2001: Trade Court Addresses Festive Articles
The recent decision of the United States Court of International Trade in Park B. Smith, Ltd., v.
United States has increased the types of articles that can be classified as "festive articles" under Heading 9505 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
In that case, the trade court recognized that two-dimensional representations of holiday themes found on dhurries, placemats, napkins and table runners rendered these items festive articles.
www.us.danzas.com /worldwide/northamerica/resource/308.html   (373 words)

  
 Court of International Trade
International trade is an essential part of the American economy and the world economy.
The USCIT website indicates that the first case tried by the first judge appointed to the first court established under the United States Constitution dealt with a dispute involving importation to the new nation.
USCIT opinions are additionally available in print in the Federal Supplement [Williams 4th KF105.F44], Customs Bulletin and Decisions Williams 5th KF6200.5.A553 and International Trade Reporter Decisions Williams 5th KF6655.A2 I58.
www.ll.georgetown.edu /intl/guides/CourtofInternationalTrade.cfm   (1142 words)

  
 Congressman Charles B. Rangel - (NY15) - Cong. Rangel Dedicates James L. Watson Court Of International Trade
As was the practice in the Customs Court, he was also assigned to preside over various criminal and civil matters in Federal District Courts across the country.
Moving from the private practice of law into the political arena, he was elected to the New York State Senate, where he served from 1954 to 1963, when he was elected to the Civil Court.
In 1970, he helped modernize the court, bringing it more in line with the rest of the federal judiciary and, as chairman of its committee on rules and practices, was instrumental in rewriting its rules and communications systems.
www.house.gov /apps/list/press/ny15_rangel/CBRDedicatesWatsonCourtofInternationalTrade111003.html   (586 words)

  
 King & Spalding > Attorney Brief > Jeffrey M. Telep   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13)
Telep was lead counsel for the United States in more than 70 actions involving the regulation of international trade, including antidumping and countervailing duties cases, Customs fraud prosecutions, and trade embargo enforcement actions.
Telep was a judicial law clerk for the Honorable G. Kendall Sharp, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida.
Telep is admitted to the bars of the District of Columbia and Florida, and is admitted to practice in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of International Trade, the United States Court of Federal Claims, and the Supreme Court of Florida.
www.kslaw.com /attorney_dir/attorneybrief.asp?271   (365 words)

  
 Infoplease Search: united states
United States, case decided in 1957 by the U.S. Supreme Court.
United States, case decided in 1919 by the U.S. Supreme Court.
(Encyclopedia) United States Naval Academy, at Annapolis, Md.; for training young men and women to be officers of...
www.infoplease.com /search.php3?query=United+States&in=encyclopedia   (248 words)

  
 United States Court of International Trade - LexisNexis InfoPro - Zimmerman's Research Guide
The U.S. Court of International Trade and its predecessor, the United States Customs Court (1938-1980), were created to try cases related to international trade.
The Court of International Trade Web site posts contact information, court rules, biographical information and special procedures for individual judges, the court calendar, forms and slip opinions back to 1999 (www.cit.uscourts.gov).
Court of International Trade opinions are also reported in the Federal Supplement, Customs Bulletin and Decisions and International Trade Reporter Decisions.
www.lexisnexis.com /infopro/zimmerman/disp.aspx?z=2065   (255 words)

  
 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn | News | Overview | United States v. Action Products International Decision
In its recent decision of United States v.
01-21, the United States Court of International Trade held that a consignee of merchandise may be held liable under the penalty statute, even where they are not the importer of record.
The Court of International Trade also decided that a person could not be held liable for either negligent or grossly negligent aiding and abetting a violation of the penalty statute.
www.barnesrichardson.com /news/overview.aspx?NewsID=320899005   (116 words)

  
 United States District Court - Southern District of Ohio
United States District Court - Southern District of Ohio
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Application for Admission to the Bar of the United States District Court at The Southern District of Ohio
www.ohsd.uscourts.gov /map.htm   (218 words)

  
 LLRX -- International Trade in Agricultural Products: A Research Guide   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13)
The United States and Canada were reluctant to agree to major changes because of the powerful farm lobbies in both countries.
The Protocol on Trade calls for trade liberalization, the elimination of trade barriers and of import and export duties, harmonization with the trading practices of the WTO and SPS measures.
United States law that impacts trade in agricultural products is found in international agreements the U.S. enters into, in U.S. statutory and administrative law and in the decisions of U.S. Courts.
www.llrx.com /features/agproducts.htm   (8090 words)

  
 King & Spalding > Attorney Brief > Daniel L. Schneiderman   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13)
Schneiderman spent seven years as an associate in the international trade group of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP, where he represented clients in a variety of trade remedy cases.
Schneiderman was a judicial law clerk for the Honorable John M. Steadman on the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Schneiderman is admitted to the bars of the District of Columbia and Maryland, and is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of International Trade.
www.kslaw.com /attorney_dir/attorneybrief.asp?1514   (236 words)

  
 C.V. Starr Lecture I
Legal practitioners have noted that, in recent years, the majority of trade cases heard by the Court of International Trade are remedy-related, as opposed to tariff-classification cases, which made up the majority of cases over 20 years ago.
As the Court of International Trade celebrates its 25th anniversary, it seems appropriate to examine current issues and trends in the administration and enforcement of national and global trade regulations.
was appointed a judge of the United States Court of International Trade in 1985.
www.nyls.edu /pages/3193.asp   (786 words)

  
 St. Johns University School of Law:Faculty   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13)
Judge Re is the recipient of twenty honorary degrees from universities in the United States and abroad.
In 1961 Judge Re was appointed by President John F. Kennedy Chairman of the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States.
As Chief Judge he served as a statutory member of the Judicial Conference of the United States, and in 1990 was appointed by Chief Justice Rehnquist to the Executive Committee of the Judicial Conference of the United States and to the Judicial Conference Committee on Long Range Planning.
www.law.stjohns.edu /pls/portal30/lawdev.law_pub_bio.faculty_profile?p_faculty_id=31&p_link=1   (355 words)

  
 Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | Attorneys | Kenneth J. Pierce
1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. Kenneth J. Pierce is a partner in the International Trade Department of Willkie Farr and Gallagher LLP in Washington, D.C. Mr.
Pierce writes and lectures frequently on international trade law issues in diverse forums in the United States and abroad.
United States District Court, District of Columbia, 1984
www.willkie.com /attorneys/bio_detail.aspx?iEmployee_ID=323573605   (557 words)

  
 Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP | Attorneys | Christopher A. Dunn
1875 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. Christopher A. Dunn is a partner in the International Trade Department of Willkie Farr and Gallagher LLP in Washington, D.C. Mr.
Dunn among the leading individuals practicing in the area of international trade law.
Prior to his arrival at Willkie in 1985, he was with the firms of Sutherland Asbill and Brennan from 1977-79; Arter and Hadden from 1979-83; and Wald Harkrader and Ross, as a partner, from 1983-85.
www.willkie.com /ChristopherDunn   (349 words)

  
 FR Doc 04-905
There was no appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
As there is now a final and conclusive court decision in this case, we are amending the final results of review and we will instruct the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate entries subject to this review.
In issuing its decision in this case, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') instructed the Department to exclude the category ``consumption of traded goods'' from the direct input costs used in the calculation of the surrogate overhead, profit, and SG&A ratios used in the Department's antidumping duty margin calculations.
a257.g.akamaitech.net /7/257/2422/14mar20010800/edocket.access.gpo.gov/2004/04-905.htm   (592 words)

  
 Updates on Duty Drawback and U.S. Customs Regulations.
The United States Court of International Trade decided on December 14, 2001 in favor of Precision Specialty Metals, Inc., Plaintiff v.
United States of America, Defendant, granting Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. a motion for summary judgment.
Click here to view the entire Decisions of the United States Court of International Trade (requires Acrobat Reader).
www.dutycalc.com /dc_rupda_precision.html   (216 words)

  
 Brooklyn Law School: Alumni and Giving
On Monday, November 10, the United States Court of International Trade in Manhattan was renamed the “James L. Watson United States Court of International Trade Building” in honor of the late Judge James Lopez Watson, Brooklyn Law School Class of 1951.
Watson was elected to the New York State Senate in 1954, where he served for nine years before winning election to the New York Civil Court.
In 1966, he was appointed to the United States Court of International Trade by President Lyndon B. Johnson and served on the Court until his death in 2001.
www.brooklaw.edu /alumni/news/index.php?artID=360&catID=   (294 words)

  
 The George Washington University Law School - Faculty Profiles
He has represented clients before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of International Trade, ICSID, ICC, and ad hoc arbitral panels, the World Trade Organization’s Dispute Settlement Body, and NAFTA Chapter 19 panels.
Ryan clerked for the Honorable Gregory W. Carman, Chief Judge of the United States Court of International Trade.
Ryan also teaches a course on international dispute resolution at George Mason University School of Law.
www.law.gwu.edu /Faculty/profile.aspx?id=900   (146 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.