Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York


Related Topics

In the News (Thu 31 Dec 09)

  
 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is the federal district court whose jurisdiction comprises the following counties: New York (Manhattan), Bronx, Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange, Dutchess, and Sullivan.
The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York represents the United States in civil and criminal litigation in the court.
The Southern District of New York was subdivided out of the U.S. District Court for the District of New York on April 9, 1814 along with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Southern_District_of_New_York   (428 words)

  
 In re: UNITED STATES LINES, INC. (2nd Cir. 1999)
It is apparent from this language that the bankruptcy court intended to establish venue for the MALC claims in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
In appealing to the district court, both parties conceded that this ruling was "final" for purposes of appeal to the district court, but MALC objected to the order on the ground that the bankruptcy court lacked the authority to set venue.
MALC's Motion essentially seeks a transfer of venue from the Southern District to the MDL panel in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania or the Northern District of Ohio.
www.admiraltylawguide.com /circt/2ndinreuslines.html   (3239 words)

  
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
While the court did not expressly address what level of distinctiveness applied, by affording trademark protection for the telephone number, the court implicitly held that it could not have been generic, as generic marks are never afforded trademark protections.
The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 15 to permit such amendments when the party seeking the amendment has not unduly delayed, the party is not acting in bad faith or with a dilatory motive, the opposing party will not be unduly prejudiced, and the amendment is not futile.
The Court finds that issues of material fact exist regarding whether Plaintiff used her mark as required by 15 U.S.C. The second requirement necessary to establish abandonment is the registrant’s intent not to resume.
pub.bna.com /eclr/991401.htm   (7058 words)

  
 Home
As the court completes its move to the new Annex through January, most chambers will move to the 613 exchange.
The district comprises the counties of Kings, Nassau, Queens, Richmond, and Suffolk and concurrently with the Southern District, the waters within the counties of Bronx and New York.
It is situated near Hecksher State Park, the Connetquot River State Park Preserve, Bayard Cutting Arboretum State Park, and the Caleb Smith State Park Preserve.
www.nyed.uscourts.gov   (687 words)

  
 Court Interpreters Office, United States District Court, Southern District of New York   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
The Southern District of New York Interpreters Office coordinates the provision of interpreters and/or translators as needed by the District Court, Pretrial Services Agency, Probation Department or other arm of the court.
Pursuant to the Court Interpreter's Act (28 USC 1827), each federal court is required to provide, at judiciary expense, a certified or otherwise qualified interpreter in judicial proceedings instituted by the United States for a party who speaks only or primarily a language other than English.
In the event an interpreter works in one federal district in the morning and in another federal district or for a CJA attorney in the afternoon, the second half of the day must be billed at the second half-day rate, not the first half.
sdnyinterpreters.org   (630 words)

  
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
whether the Court erred in concluding that Plaintiffs’ claims under international law and the Alien Tort Claims Act were released under the terms of the settlement as judicially fashioned and approved by the Supreme Court of India under Article 142(1) of the Indian Constitution;
whether the Court abused its discretion in concluding that the Defendants’ conveyance of its properties in India to the "Bhopal Hospital Trust" in order to avoid attachment and forfeiture by the Bhopal District Court for failure to appear in the criminal case did not constitute a breach of the settlement;
whether the Court erred as a matter of law and abused its discretion by drawing an impermissible inference from the fact that the Indian Supreme Court did not condition the sale of Union Carbide India Ltd. shares upon Union Carbide’s appearance in the Bhopal District Court to face the criminal charges pending against it.
www.bhopal.net /oldsite/oldwebsite/appeal2000.html   (613 words)

  
 [No title]
Exhibit B hereto is a true copy of an article published in the 1/29/02 New York Times relating to Toys-R-Us entitled "Toys 'R' Us Plans to Lay Off 1,900 and Close 64 Stores.
Exhibit C hereto is a series of articles, as follows: "Kmart Misery Grows", New York Post 1/21/02 p.
Exhibit D hereto is a true copy of an article entitled "Aisles Grow Less Cluttered as End Nears for Bookstore", published in The New York Times 1/11/02, Section B, p.
www.lawmall.com /bookcase/b_dec11.txt   (1389 words)

  
 SEC v ROBERT C. INGARDIA - Legal Case Documents
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Litigation Release No. 18071 / April 4, 2003 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Case No.
On September 6, 2001, in the case of, Case No. 01-CV-8356 (S.D.N.Y.) (WHP), the Commission sought and obtained a temporary restraining order prohibiting Ingardia from violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.
The Commission's Complaint was based on some of the same underlying facts as a criminal complaint filed against Ingardia by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York on August 31, 2001.
www.legalcasedocs.com /120/255/585.html   (421 words)

  
 United States District Court for the Southern District... - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
United States District Court for the Southern District...
Start the United States District Court for the Southern District...
Look for "United States District Court for the Southern District...
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/United_States_District_Court_for_the_Southern_District...   (161 words)

  
 US District Court, Southern District of New York   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-11)
US District Court, Southern District of New York
Effective January 2, 2007, the duty station of District Judge Colleen McMahon will change to Foley Square...
For court business, including inquiries regarding cases, documents or jury duty, please consult the Court directory or other appropriate page in this site.
www.nysd.uscourts.gov   (66 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.