| |
| | The Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, 85 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. May 31, ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-07) |
 | | Appeal from decision of the Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, holding that the petitioner had discriminated against the intervenor, in violation of Section 210(a) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. [[section]] 5851(b) (1988). |
 | | The Secretary held that Delcore met the statutory definition of employee because the alleged discrimination arose out of the employment relationship, and therefore, the statutory scheme was applicable. |
 | | In his decision, the Secretary of Labor determined that despite Delcore's status as a former employee, he fell within the scope of the term "employee" because the alleged discrimination arose out of the employment relationship. |
| www.oalj.dol.gov /public/WBLOWER/decsn/95_4094.htm (4951 words) |
|