Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: United States v. Microsoft

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Ads by Google

Related Topics

Microsoft Windows

Microsoft Word

Microsoft Office

Microsoft NET

Microsoft Excel

Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft Outlook

Microsoft PowerPoint

Microsoft Access

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Exchange Server

In the News (Sun 19 May 13)

EXECUTIVE POWER

Iran

ANALYSIS

Pakistan

Family compact

United States v. Microsoft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 2d 30 (D.D.C.) was a court case filed against Microsoft Corporation on May 18, 1998 by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and twenty U.S. states. Microsoft stated that the merging of Microsoft Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free. Microsoft vigorously defended itself in the public arena, claiming that its attempts to innovate were under attack by rival companies jealous at its success, and that government litigation was merely their pawn. en.wikipedia.org /wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft   (2196 words)

United States v. Microsoft Corp. Microsoft argues that the "depositions" referred to in the statute are not the depositions known today under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, namely, interrogations undertaken for the purpose of pretrial discovery. Unlike Microsoft, however, we conclude that "deposition" had the same meaning in 1913 as it has now—the pretrial examination of a witness in which testimony is given under oath pursuant to a process authorized by law; it is only the use to which a deposition may be put in federal court that has changed. Microsoft contends first that the term "deposition" as used by the Congress in 1913 had a completely different meaning than it has today, indeed that § 30 cannot have been intended to apply to pretrial discovery depositions because they were unknown in 1913. lw.bna.com /lw/19990209/985399.htm   (3580 words)

Cusumano, In re (United States v. Microsoft Corp.) On May 18, 1998, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and several state attorneys general brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, charging Microsoft with various antitrust violations. Microsoft wants to use the subpoenaed materials in defending a civil antitrust case, United States v. Microsoft, a litigant in a court in another district, moved in the District of Massachusetts to compel the respondents (who are not parties to that litigation) to honor subpoenas duces tecum. lw.bna.com /lw/19990105/2133.htm   (4508 words)

FindLaw for Legal Professionals - Case Law, Federal and State Resources, Forms, and Code The Honorable Richard A. Posner, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, was appointed to serve as mediator. Microsoft points out that Continental Ore and the other cases cited by plaintiffs in support of "course of conduct" liability all involve conspiracies among multiple firms, not the conduct of a single firm; in that setting the "course of conduct" is the conspiracy itself, for which all the participants may be held liable. Microsoft's conduct related to its Java developer tools served to protect its monopoly of the operating system in a manner not attributable either to the superiority of the operating system or to the acumen of its makers, and there- fore was anticompetitive. laws.lp.findlaw.com /dc/005212a.html   (16211 words)

Judge drops hammer on MS 'monopoly' Tech News on ZDNet An appeals court that could eventually hear the case already has sided with Microsoft twice. Jackson said Microsoft had used its position to harm consumers and rivals. Almost without exception, long-time Microsoft rivals reacted by saying they'd expected to see Microsoft declared a bullying monopolist. news.zdnet.com /2100-9595_22-516458.html   (1256 words)

U.S. v. Microsoft: Settlement Information On November 6, 2001, the United States and Microsoft tentatively agreed to the entry of a revised proposed Final Judgment to resolve the United States' civil antitrust case against Microsoft. The United States reserves the right to withdraw its consent to the revised proposed Final Judgment at any time prior to its acceptance by the court. After receiving the comments and the United States' response, the court may enter the revised proposed Final Judgment if it is found to be in the public interest. www.usdoj.gov /atr/cases/ms-settle.htm   (402 words)

United States v. Microsoft Microsoft's Jurisdictional Statement to the Supreme Court of the United States Disclaimer: I am not a consultant of the United States Department of Justice, Microsoft, or any of the Attorneys General of the 19 States and the District of Columbia that are suing Microsoft Analysis of the settlement of the United States and some States with Microsoft raven.stern.nyu.edu /networks/ms/top.html   (248 words)

The United States v. Microsoft :: The Center for the Advancement of Capitalism The Center for the Advancement of Capitalism filed an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief with the United States Court of Appeals, DC Circuit, in support of Microsoft in its ongoing antitrust battle with the Department of Justice. United States District Court Judge Thomas P. Jackson is crystal clear in his recent “findings of fact”: Microsoft is marked for destruction. The judge also approved a settlement with a number of state attorneys general that sued Microsoft and issued an opinion disposing of claims raised by states that didn't join the settlements. www.capitalismcenter.org /Advocacy/Antitrust/Microsoft   (508 words)

United States v. Microsoft The U.S. Department of Justice and 20 states are claiming Microsoft is conducting business in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. Microsoft is an MSNBC partner, but the report (published a month before these recent findings) contains remarkably objective information about the trial. U.S. vs. Microsoft Special Report and read these sections: Introduction, The Browser Battle, The Antitrust Doctrine, and The Complaint. www.learnersonline.com /weekly/archive99/week44   (610 words)

The Microsoft Case On Friday, November 1, 2002, United States District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued Opinions in the Microsoft cases, approving with minor modifications the proposed settlement between Microsoft and the Federal Government and nine states, and issuing roughly the same judgment to the remaining nine states. Microsoft filed a brief and voluminous exhibits requesting a four-month extension of time to challenge the dissenting states on remedy proposals. The states have not yet endorsed the proposal, and could continue to pursue the suit or challenge the settlment under the Tunney Act. cyber.law.harvard.edu /msdoj   (2308 words)

BRIA(16:2) King Leopold, Heart of Darkness, Belgium, Congo, Rockefeller, Standard Oil, Monopoly, United States v. Microsoft, antitrust cases In May 1998, after fruitless attempts to settle with Microsoft out of court, the federal government, 20 states, and the District of Columbia sued the company under the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. Netscape complained that Microsoft was competing unfairly, first by giving Explorer away free and second by forcing the manufacturers to make it the default browser on their computers. Even so, the federal and state governments decided to go on with their antitrust lawsuits, alleging that Microsoft was illegally attempting to preserve its Windows monopoly. www.crf-usa.org /bria/bria16_2.html   (5715 words)

U.S. v. Microsoft: Current Case Motion of United States of America for Summary Dismissal of Microsoft's Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Stay Pending Appeal on the Ground that it is Premature, or to Defer Consideration Pending a Determination as to Jurisdiction (06/14/2000) Memorandum of the United States in Opposition to the Joint Motion of Amici Curiae CCIA and SIIA for Leave to Intervene for Purposes of Appeal (01/06/2003) Memorandum of the United States in Opposition to the Motion of Amicus Curiae Consumers for Computing Choice for Leave to Intervene for Purposes of Appeal (01/10/2003) www.usdoj.gov /atr/cases/ms_index.htm   (1318 words)

On the Proposed Final Judgment in United States v. Microsoft Microsoft increases the Applications Barrier to Entry by using restrictive license terms and intentional incompatibilities. Microsoft currently uses restrictive licensing terms to keep Open Source or Free Software apps from running on Windows. The PFJ supposedly allows users to replace Microsoft Middleware with competing middleware, but it defines "Microsoft Middleware" so narrowly that the next version of Windows might not be covered at all. www.kegel.com /remedy/remedy2.html   (5667 words)

United States v. Microsoft Brief of Association for Competitive Technology as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Proposed Conclusions of Law Two America Online, Inc. executives recently testified in the Remedy Proceedings in the State of New York, et al. **This site is designed to work best with Microsoft Internet Explorer 5 or Netscape 4.0 or higher. legal.web.aol.com /decisions/dlother/microsoft.html   (113 words)

District Court Opinions Sign up to receive E-mail notification of all proceedings in US v. Memorandum Opinion and Order filed February 22, 2002 www.dcd.uscourts.gov /microsoft-2001.html   (158 words)

U.S. v. Microsoft: Current Case Motion of United States of America for Summary Dismissal of Microsoft's Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Stay Pending Appeal on the Ground that it is Premature, or to Defer Consideration Pending a Determination as to Jurisdiction (06/14/2000) Microsoft, et al.) Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss, Proposed Order, and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of United States' Motion to Dismiss (02/08/2002) Brief of the United States in Opposition to Microsoft's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (08/31/2001) www.usdoj.gov /atr/cases/ms_index.htm   (1318 words)

U.S. v. Microsoft: Current Case Motion of United States of America for Summary Dismissal of Microsoft's Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Stay Pending Appeal on the Ground that it is Premature, or to Defer Consideration Pending a Determination as to Jurisdiction (06/14/2000) Microsoft, et al.) Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss, Proposed Order, and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and in Support of United States' Motion to Dismiss (02/08/2002) Brief of the United States in Opposition to Microsoft's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (08/31/2001) www.usdoj.gov /atr/cases/ms_index.htm   (1269 words)

THQ® Legal Microsoft, Xbox and the Xbox logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries and are used under license from Microsoft. Microsoft, Xbox, and the Xbox logos are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries and are used under license from Microsoft. Microsoft and the Microsoft Game Studios logo are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries and are used under license. www.thq.com /legals.asp   (8625 words)

B.TXT bbs: G.!.$ s/n: K1E= BB Stock Tool v3.4 Crack Beach Front Quizzer v2.2 70-13 Implementing and Supporting Microsoft SNA Server 3.0 s/n: 109310189107 70-14 Implementing and Supporting Microsoft System Management Server 1.0 s/n: 269286749289 70-151 Microsoft Windows Operating Systems and Services Arch. Version 1.0 Build 22016W 05/14/99 cd-key crack Blockman v1.0 s/n: 2K13851 Blockman II v1.0 s/n: RNT2WXY Blocks Door +v1.00 : bbs: G.!.$ bbsPhone: 031000000 name: The GuaRDiaN aNGeL s/n: 439920 Blocks Door +v1.00 (02) : bbs: G.!.$ bbsPhone: 031000000 name: TeLLeRBoP s/n: 228294 Blocks Door +v1.00 (03) : bbsname: G!$ bbsPhone: 031000000 name: NoBoDy! 1.0 Crack BattleStar v2.5 Name: SiLicon Surfer [PC] Code: 3038224192 Babyz s/n: 123-rcEa-aaas-gbd BBS Bowl +v1.7 : name: The GuaRDiaN aNGeL s/n: 18384 or name: TeLLeRBoP s/n: 17684 BBS Bowl +v1.7 (2) : name: NoBoDy! www.hereintown.net /~knives/SERIALS/B.TXT   (1995 words)

Dataprise, Inc. - Manage your business, not your network�. ROCKVILLE, MD (June 11, 2002) - Dataprise, Inc. announced today that it has been awarded a contract to assist the United States Enrichment Corporation�s (USEC) information technology group with an enterprise-wide Microsoft Windows 2000 and Microsoft Active Directory upgrade. Dataprise, Inc. Awarded Contract To Provide Microsoft Consulting Services To The United States Enrichment Corporation. As an investor-owned company, USEC Inc. continues a 30-year tradition of reliability�no customer�s delivery requirement has ever been missed, either in timeliness or in quantity. www.dataprise.com /news/2002_06_11_usec.asp   (1995 words)

Gamasutra There is no indication of what type of games either developer will be producing for the next generation Xbox, and the wording of Microsoft’s press release suggests that they are free to develop different titles for other formats, but this is nevertheless an important move for Microsoft. An over-emphasis on Western developed shoot ‘em-ups and racing games has long been the major standing criticism of the Xbox as a format, and these latest announcements seem to suggest that Microsoft are well aware of the problem. He left Sega studio United Game Artists (UGA) in October 2003 to co-found Q Entertainment, which has so far produced puzzle games Lumines for the PSP and Meteos for the Nintendo DS. www.gamasutra.com /php-bin/news_index_plain.php?story=5040   (368 words)

You know you've got a browser problem when … InfoWorld Column 2004-07-09 By Oliver Rist That’s what happened to beleaguered Microsoft when the department's Computer Emergency Readiness Team (CERT) recently recommended users switch to alternate browser platforms to avoid the security holes in IE caused largely by ActiveX. Microsoft's own Slate even posted an article advocating Firefox, a Mozilla offshoot, in favor of IE until Microsoft gets its security act together. Configuration and policy based security systems are a pro-active way to defend against IT security... www.infoworld.com /article/04/07/09/28enterwin_1.html   (1523 words)

List of the Knowledge Base articles that discuss database-related topics in FrontPage 2000 For more information about working with FrontPage and databases, click Microsoft FrontPage Help on the Help menu, type databases in the Office Assistant or the Answer Wizard, and then click Search to view the topic. This article lists the most common Knowledge Base articles that discuss database-related topics in Microsoft FrontPage 2000. 205980 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/205980/) HOW TO: Return a List of Records as Hyperlinks Using ASP in FrontPage 2000 support.microsoft.com /support/kb/articles/Q301/9/86.ASP?LN%3DEN-   (648 words)

Silicon Times Report Online In the next few months, ISPs in the United States will begin receiving reports on the zombies, or PCs open to control by hackers, that lurk on their networks. Washington state Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez on Thursday granted Microsoft's request for a temporary restraining order to prevent Kai-Fu Lee from violating his non-compete agreement. A judge has temporarily barred a former Microsoft executive hired by Google from performing any duties at the search giant similar to those he performed at Microsoft. forums.streport.com   (1469 words)

CXOtoday.com > News > Software > Microsoft Further's ERP Push With Navision 4.0 Navision 4.0 is currently available in Austria, Canada, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, South Africa, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Microsoft can not only compete but will outwit all competitors in the SMB ERP Space because of its user friendlyness,easy to implement facilities,features,vertical fitment,and most important of all the cost, it is available at a price which is very affordable. CXOtoday.com > News > Software > Microsoft Further's ERP Push With Navision 4.0 www.cxotoday.com /cxo/jsp/index.jsp?section=News&subsection=Software&subsection_code=4&file=template1.jsp&storyid=1612   (681 words)

Case Study: United Farmers of Alberta Outside the 50 United States and Canada, please contact your local Microsoft subsidiary. Customers who are deaf or hard-of-hearing can reach Microsoft text telephone (TTY/TDD) services at (800) 892-5234 in the United States or (905) 568-9641 in Canada. United Farmers of Alberta (UFA), formed in 1909, is a farm supply and petroleum marketing co-operative and was organized to enable members to co-operatively purchase farm supplies and other goods or services, combining maximum economic benefit and service. www.microsoft.com /canada/casestudies/ufa.asp   (1018 words)

Terms of Use Microsoft is not a broker/dealer or registered investment advisor under United States federal securities law or securities laws of other jurisdictions, and does not advise individuals as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing or selling securities or other financial products or services. Microsoft, MSN, MSN logo (butterfly), and/or other Microsoft products and services referenced herein may also be either trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft in the United States and/or other countries. Microsoft and its suppliers do not authorize the use of information available from the MSN Web Sites including stock quote or other financial information, for any purpose other than your personal use, and prohibit to the maximum extent allowable the resale, redistribution, and use of this information for commercial purposes. privacy2.msn.com /tou/en-us/default.aspx   (2490 words)

Hardware Extreme - News - Updated Daily! Intel, Microsoft Corp., the National Foundation for Cancer Research (NFCR), Oxford University and United Devices today asked computer users around the world to join with them in the Anthrax Research Project, an international effort designed to help scientists develop a treatment for the anthrax toxin. KUALA LUMPUR, Jan. 24, 2002 — Intel, Microsoft Corp., the National Foundation for Cancer Research (NFCR), Oxford University and United Devices today asked computer users around the world to join with them in the Anthrax Research Project, an international effort designed to help scientists develop a treatment for the anthrax toxin. United Devices’ MetaProcessor platform is an enterprise technology that allows companies to harness the idle resources of their existing computers, either on corporate networks or the Internet. www.hwextreme.com /NewsPub1/News/Stories/2002/01/25/10119760541.shtml   (924 words)

Labs Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom, located at 7 J J Thomson Ave in Cambridge, UK, was founded in 1997 and now numbers about 75 employees. Microsoft Research Cambridge maintains close ties to University of Cambridge and the University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. The Cambridge lab conducts basic computer science research on a wide variety of topics, including machine learning, security, information retrieval, operating systems, programming techniques and networking. research.microsoft.com /labs/cam.asp   (557 words)

Microsoft Student Ambassador > Home ( DNN 3.1.1 ) Microsoft Student Ambassador is an annual award recognizing college students in the United States who have demonstrated strong technical knowledge of Microsoft developer technologies, and who willingly share that knowledge with fellow students through campus groups, clubs, and online communities. Please note that if you are a Microsoft Student Ambassador attending school outside the United States, you need to contact your own program's administrators to find the right community site. If you're a member of the US program, a Microsoft employee looking to get involved, or otherwise have a compelling need to be part of this community, email us. www.studentambassador.net   (198 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.