| |
| | John A. T. Robinson - New Testament Redating (1976) |
 | | Marxsen, writing from a very different standpoint, regards the phrase as a vague reference to the forthcoming destruction of the temple and is forthright in saying: 'From Mark's point of view, a vaticinium ex eventu is an impossibility.' [W. Marxsen, Mark the Evangelist, ET Nashville, Tenn., 1969, 170 (cf. |
 | | And this conclusion is borne out in a further study by Sigfred Pedersen [S. Pedersen, 'Zum Problem der vaticinia ex eventu (eine Analyse von Mt 21.33-46 par; 22.1-10 par)',.ST19, 1965, 167-88.], who believes that this and the preceding parable of the wicked husbandmen are fundamentally shaped by material from the Old Testament, especially Jeremiah. |
 | | The most he will say is that if Matthew is writing after 70, then we must see this as a contributory occasion for the addition (which of course no one would deny). |
| www.preteristarchive.com /Books/1976_robinson_redating-testament.html (7674 words) |
|