| |
| | [No title] (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-01) |
 | | In short, we get an imagined proto-language of Harappan times that looks vaguely like Vedic Sanskrit as far as its roots (dhAtu) are concerned, but that does not yet have its affixes (prefixes, suffixes, infixes). |
 | | Of course, Mishra's Harappan is quite different from Rajaram's and Jha's "late Vedic" Indus language (Delhi 2000, see Frontline, Oct. 13, 2000), that they based on their own particular "reading" of the *same* Indus seals. |
 | | Mishra's view, in fact, is based on the typical late 19th/early 20th century Darwinistic vision and strict division of the world's languages into isolating, agglutinative and flexional, with an assumed development from 'primitive' isolating (e.g., Chinese) towards 'fully developed' flexional languages (such as Indo-European, Semitic). |
| nautilus.shore.net /~india/ejvs/ejvs0701/ejvs0701.txt (1630 words) |
|