| |
| | Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 502 F.Supp. 259 (D.D.C., Nov. 5 1980) (narrative account, damages, attorney's fees) |
 | | Although it was planned that Paz and Suarez were to take responsibility for detonation of the device on Monday, September 20, they insisted that Townley, as a DINA agent, attach it. |
 | | Paz, however, was very curt, chiding Townley for using the telephone for sensitive conversations before immediately hanging up. |
 | | Also shortly after the Letelier mission, Townley made a telephone call to Paz in the United States, who explained to Townley that the bomb had not been detonated on Monday, September 20, 1976, because of a malfunction and, as a consequence, CNM had removed the bomb from Letelier’s car, fixed it, and then reinstalled it. |
| homepage.ntlworld.com /jksonc/docs/letelier-502FSupp259.html (4077 words) |
|