| |
| | Judge Mark King Leban -Guidelines of Voir Dire Examination in Jury Trials |
 | | It is well settled that the purpose of voir dire is to secure an impartial jury, and "impartiality requires not only freedom from jury bias against the accused and for the prosecution but also freedom from jury bias against the prosecution and for the accused." Moody v. |
 | | Problems in voir dire examination of prospective jurors arise in the posing of hypothetical questions, scenarios requesting the jury to commit itself to a particular verdict if a given set of facts is presented, and in preconditioning the jury to render a particular verdict. |
 | | State, 398 So.2d 1017, 1018 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the prosecutor, during voir dire of the jury, set forth for the jurors "a hypothetical question which essentially embodied the facts of the case against the accused, thus attempting to, and probably succeeding in, obtaining at least a tacit commitment from the jurors to convict. |
| www.countyjudges.com /articles/lebanv1.htm (1323 words) |
|