Western text-type - Factbites
 Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Western text-type


    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.


  
 Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Byzantine texts read "God was manifest in the flesh", whereas Alexandrian texts, with support from the Old Latin, Vulgate, Peshitta, Western text-type and many early church fathers read "He was manifest in the flesh".
The oldest near-complete manuscripts of the New Testament belong to this text-type, and are known as Codex Vaticanus in the Vatican library and Codex Sinaiticus in the British Museum.
The Byzantine text is also the one found in modern Greek Orthodox editions, though this might simply be a matter of not wanting to break with tradition.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Alexandrian_text-type   (564 words)

  
 Western text-type - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Western text-type is a diverse group of manuscripts of the New Testament whose text is similar to that of early Christian writers in Rome and Gaul, including Justin Martyr and Irenaeus.
The most prominent witnesses to the Western text-type are Codex Bezae in the Gospels and Codex Claromontanus in Paul's letters as well as the Vetus Latina and Old Syriac translations.
In at least two Western texts, the Gospels appear in a variant order: Matthew, John, Luke, Mark.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Western_text-type   (170 words)

  
 Text-Types Of The New Testament Manuscripts: Alexandrian ("Neutral"), Western, Byzantine & Caesarean
The most important Greek manuscripts that present a Western type of text are codex Bezae (D) of the fifth or sixth century (containing the Gospels and Acts), codex Claromontanus (D) of the sixth century (containing the Pauline Epistles), and, for Mark 1:1 to 5:30, codex Washingtonianus (W) of the late fourth or early fifth century.
That is, it is generally shorter than the text of other forms, and it does not exhibit the degree of grammatical and stylistic polishing that is characteristic of the Byzantine and, to a lesser extent, of the Caesarean type of text.
Another Eastern type of text, current in and near Antioch, is preserved today chiefly in Old Syriac witnesses, namely the Sinaitic and the Curetonian manuscripts of the Gospels and in the quotations of Scripture contained in the works of Aphraates and Ephraem.
www.islamic-awareness.org /Bible/Text/Mss/textype.html   (1434 words)

  
 Some Thoughts For Evaluating the KJV/Majority Text vs. New Translations/Minority Text Debate
Byzantine Text advocates often assert that many manuscript copies of the Scripture were corrupted in the early centuries of the church (pre-fourth-century), and these corrupted manuscripts are identified with the non-Byzantine Text-types, or particularly the Alexandrian Text-family which usually stands behind the modern translations.
The KJV is a "text," as is the RSV.
Although the two texts are more similar than are the Critical Text and the Textus Receptus (TR),5 the Byzantine Text differs from the TR in over 1,838 places, thus the reading of the KJV does not always reflect the reading of the Byzantine Text.
www.apostolic.net /biblicalstudies/kjvevaluation.htm   (5777 words)

  
 Textual Criticism
The date of the witness or, rather, of the type of text.
Both Erasmus, who created the first printed Greek text, and the translators of the King James Version of the Bible used this type of text.
This family of texts was clsoely related to the church in the west, particularly in North Africa.
www.earlham.edu /~seidti/iam/text_crit.html   (1517 words)

  
 The Error of King James Only.
The Alexandrian Text -- or, certainly, it's root in the Early "normal" text -- was the basis for the theoretical Caesarean text (of which Jerome writes), and the equally theoretical "Western Text" also exhibits influences from either the Alexandrian text or the Early "normal" and free texts.
However, these kinds of text clearly reflect that the New Testament Text had already begun to diverge in the independent copying period (prior to and, in part, due to the Diocletianic persecutions), but the divergence was not yet as highly pronounced or as "planned" as it would become during the Text-Type period.
the Byzantine text is "the Koine text" (p.xx).
www.revneal.org /Writings/errorof.htm   (10055 words)

  
 Text-Types and Textual Kinship
The Western text is largely Latin; it is found primarily in the Old Latin and in a few Greek/Latin diglot uncials (in the Gospels, D/05; in Acts, D/05 plus a few versions such as the margin of the Harklean Syriac; in Paul, D/06, F/010, G/012).
Westcott and Hort's text is based largely on the evidence of text-types, and remains the model New Testament text to this day (if it be noted that the UBS text has now supplanted WH, it should be noticed that UBS, like the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from WH).
The text printed by Westcott and Hort is, in almost all instances, the Neutral text (the so-called "Western Non-Interpolations" represent one of the few major exceptions).
www.skypoint.com /~waltzmn/TextTypes.html   (16332 words)

  
 Hypotyposeis: SBL Paper on Caesarean Text Now Ready
Codex Θ, along with 565 and 700, is a member of a small sub-family that has been considerably assimilated to a Bezan-type text.
I've uploaded the paper, "The Origin(s) of the 'Caesarean' Text", I'll be giving at the 2004 Annual Meeting of the SBL in San Antonio this Saturday.
Origen's text in this section of Mark also belongs to this group, and, given family 1's connection to the library in Caesarea, this group can plausibly be called "Caesarean." Contrary to Streeter, Θ and W are not this group's leading members, but poor, rather impure representatives.
www.hypotyposeis.org /weblog/2004/11/sbl-paper-on-caesarean-text-now-ready.html   (276 words)

  
 Bible
The original text of the Tanakh was in Hebrew, with some portions (notably in Daniel and Ezra) in Aramaic.
From the 800s to the 1400s, rabbinic Jewish scholars known as the Masoretes compared the text of all known Biblical manuscripts in an effort to create a unified and standardized text; a series of highly similar texts eventually emerged, and any of these texts are known as Masoretic Texts (MT).
Critics charge that the text is often divided into chapters in an incoherent way, or at inappropriate points within the narrative, and that it encourages citing passages out of context, in effect turning the Bible into a kind of textual quarry for clerical citations.
www.free-download-soft.com /info/biblical.html   (2748 words)

  
 Translations and the Greek Text
Hort writes about the neutral text: "Not only were these readings not confined to Alexandria, but a local name suggests erroneous associations when applied to a text which owes its comparative isolation to the degeneracy of its neighbours."[46] Thus the neutral name slanted any discussion associated with this text and the Syrian or Western text-type.
This text is a Byzantine type; that is, it represents a family of manuscripts that are mostly associated with the Constantinople area of modern Turkey.
Although this type of text is obviously Egyptian in origin and home, it is not possible to maintain that Egypt had preserved an uncorrupted form of text, of which B is a characteristic example.
www.bibleteachings.org /authority-6.html   (17547 words)

  
 An Analysis of The King James Version Debate. A Plea for Realism
Ireneaus, a second century writer who is classified as a "Western" text witness, goes with the KJV 34%, the modern Greek 31%, and neither 34%.
In the Greek text underlying the KJV in John, there were 32 places with the support of four or less of the 50+ manuscripts; of these, eleven were disagreements on whether or not an article (the) was to be placed before a word.
From the Nestle-Aland text references of every early manuscript through the fourth century (except for their favorites, Aleph and B), we find that 12.6% of the time, the KJV is supported, the modern Greek finds support in 34.7% of the references,, and a whopping 52.8% of the time these manuscripts go out on their own.
www.purewords.org /kjb1611/html/kjvdeba.htm   (4412 words)

  
 Geography/text-type information:
Using "Text-Types and Witnesses" chart from the Textual Criticism handout list the geographical text-type information for each manuscript witnesses identified in the previous step.
List "geography/ text type" information for each Manuscript
www.luthersem.edu /jboyce/TextCrit/sld018.htm   (32 words)

  
 Site Contents at the free Online Encyclopedia.
You are here: Online Encyclopedia > Site Map pg 7 > Western blot through Wilhelm Eduard Weber...
In a household, clothes hangers are the single one item that you own the most of, yet no one can name even one brand?
Enter a phrase or search word in the box below.
www.onlineencyclopedia.org /index_342.html   (110 words)

  
 North Western Emergency Vehicles Used Ambulance Inventory Type III
North Western Emergency Vehicles Used Ambulance Inventory Type III
Select the text link to the left of the picture for more information.
Select the thumbnail image to go to the picture gallery for the selected vehicle.
www.nwev.com /usedtypeIII.htm   (36 words)

  
 New Living Translation - Essential Guide to Bible Versions
D-text: A family of texts (a text type) sharing similar readings to Codex Bezae (D).
dynamic equivalence: A translation methodology in which the translator attempts to produce the same response in the "target" language readers as the original language text produced in the original readers.
diglot: A manuscript which presents a text in two languages at once.
www.newlivingtranslation.com /real/glossary.asp?ltr=D   (244 words)

  
 Western Text-type Images Search Results
If you would like to see the Western text-type Images search results, simply click here to go there directly.
Or, If you'd prefer you can try one of our related searches for "Western text-type":
www.folkartmuseum.com /search/images/Western_text-type   (72 words)

  
 Text-Types and Textual Kinship
Westcott and Hort's text is based largely on the evidence of text-types, and remains the model New Testament text to this day (if it be noted that the UBS text has now supplanted WH, it should be noticed that UBS, like the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from WH).
The text printed by Westcott and Hort is, in almost all instances, the Neutral text (the so-called "Western Non-Interpolations" represent one of the few major exceptions).
This would seem to imply that the text-types are survivals from an earlier era.
www.skypoint.com /~waltzmn/TextTypes.html   (16332 words)

  
 Text-Types Of The New Testament Manuscripts: Alexandrian ("Neutral"), Western, Byzantine & Caesarean
The most important Greek manuscripts that present a Western type of text are codex Bezae (D) of the fifth or sixth century (containing the Gospels and Acts), codex Claromontanus (D) of the sixth century (containing the Pauline Epistles), and, for Mark 1:1 to 5:30, codex Washingtonianus (W) of the late fourth or early fifth century.
That is, it is generally shorter than the text of other forms, and it does not exhibit the degree of grammatical and stylistic polishing that is characteristic of the Byzantine and, to a lesser extent, of the Caesarean type of text.
Another Eastern type of text, current in and near Antioch, is preserved today chiefly in Old Syriac witnesses, namely the Sinaitic and the Curetonian manuscripts of the Gospels and in the quotations of Scripture contained in the works of Aphraates and Ephraem.
www.islamic-awareness.org /Bible/Text/Mss/textype.html   (1434 words)

  
 ipedia.com: Alexandrian text-type Article
The Byzantine texts read "God was manifest in the flesh", whereas Alexandrian texts, with support from the Old Latin, Vulgate, Peshitta, Western text-type and many early church fathers read "He was manifest in the flesh".
Whilst the type of text is referred to as "Alexandrian" since most manuscripts of this early type appear to have been preserved by the dry climate of Egypt, the readings found in the Alexandrian text can generally be found in the textual traditions from all over the empire.
The oldest near-complete manuscripts of the New Testament belong to this text-type, and are known as Codex Vaticanus in the Vatican library and Codex Sinaiticus in the British Museum.
www.ipedia.com /alexandrian_text_type.html   (643 words)

  
 WESTERN TEXT-TYPE FACTS AND INFORMATION
The Western text-type is a diverse group of manuscripts of the New_Testament whose text is similar to that of early Christian writers in Rome and Gaul, including Justin_Martyr and Irenaeus.
In at least two Western texts, the Gospels appear in a variant order: Matthew, John, Luke, Mark.
These texts tend toward longer passages than is found in the other groups of texts, frequently augmented with glosses, additional details, and the original passages are replaced with longer paraphrases.
www.beatlesfacts.com /Western_text-type   (150 words)

  
 WESTERN TEXT-TYPE FACTS AND INFORMATION
The Western text-type is a diverse group of manuscripts of the New_Testament whose text is similar to that of early Christian writers in Rome and Gaul, including Justin_Martyr and Irenaeus.
In at least two Western texts, the Gospels appear in a variant order: Matthew, John, Luke, Mark.
These texts tend toward longer passages than is found in the other groups of texts, frequently augmented with glosses, additional details, and the original passages are replaced with longer paraphrases.
www.beatlesfacts.com /Western_text-type   (150 words)

  
 The Error of King James Only.
The Alexandrian Text -- or, certainly, it's root in the Early "normal" text -- was the basis for the theoretical Caesarean text (of which Jerome writes), and the equally theoretical "Western Text" also exhibits influences from either the Alexandrian text or the Early "normal" and free texts.
However, these kinds of text clearly reflect that the New Testament Text had already begun to diverge in the independent copying period (prior to and, in part, due to the Diocletianic persecutions), but the divergence was not yet as highly pronounced or as "planned" as it would become during the Text-Type period.
the Byzantine text is "the Koine text" (p.xx).
www.revneal.org /Writings/errorof.htm   (10055 words)

  
 Forever Settled Part Four : A Survey of New Testament Documents
In Mark the text is of the Western type in the first five chapters and of a mixed "Caesarean" type in the remaining chapters.
Thus the presence of the Traditional text in W indicates that this text is a very ancient text and that it was known in Egypt before the 4th century.
Therefore, because they themselves believed that the Received Text was the true apostolic Bible, and further, because the Church of Rome arrogated to itself the power to choose a Bible which bore the marks of systematic depravation, we have the testimony of these five churches to the authenticity and the apostolicity of the Received Text.
www.biblebelievers.net /bibleversions/kjcforv5.htm   (16067 words)

  
 The Error of King James Only.
The Alexandrian Text -- or, certainly, it's root in the Early "normal" text -- was the basis for the theoretical Caesarean text (of which Jerome writes), and the equally theoretical "Western Text" also exhibits influences from either the Alexandrian text or the Early "normal" and free texts.
However, these kinds of text clearly reflect that the New Testament Text had already begun to diverge in the independent copying period (prior to and, in part, due to the Diocletianic persecutions), but the divergence was not yet as highly pronounced or as "planned" as it would become during the Text-Type period.
But despite this, Aland states even the Egyptian text was later subjected to the "corrosive effects" of the Byzantine text-type (Aland, pp.65,56).
www.revneal.org /Writings/errorof.htm   (10055 words)

  
 Textual Criticism Fact and Fiction
The Western Text is now generally agreed, even among the proponents of the Critical Text, to have been the result of the over-active imagination of Hermann von Soden, and did not, in fact, ever exist.
Eerdmans Publishing, 1963, page 67) the "Caesarean" text-type is disintegrating.
These Traditional texts are the only texts that have been in uninterrupted use from the time of the close of the canon of Scripture (about 100 A. D.) until the present, thus fulfilling the requirement of being "preserved" for every generation.
www.ovrlnd.com /Bible/textualcritism.html   (12478 words)

  
 Translations and the Greek Text
It is true that P66 is not a fully Byzantine text, yet it is true it is not fully Alexandrian or Western either.[99] All three of the text-types existed side-by-side in the papyrus.
This text is a Byzantine type; that is, it represents a family of manuscripts that are mostly associated with the Constantinople area of modern Turkey.
Although this type of text is obviously Egyptian in origin and home, it is not possible to maintain that Egypt had preserved an uncorrupted form of text, of which B is a characteristic example.
www.bibleteachings.org /authority-6.html   (17547 words)

  
 Text-Types and Textual Kinship
Westcott and Hort's text is based largely on the evidence of text-types, and remains the model New Testament text to this day (if it be noted that the UBS text has now supplanted WH, it should be noticed that UBS, like the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from WH).
The text printed by Westcott and Hort is, in almost all instances, the Neutral text (the so-called "Western Non-Interpolations" represent one of the few major exceptions).
is a part of the Alexandrian text, or it is the archetype of the text.
www.skypoint.com /~waltzmn/TextTypes.html   (16332 words)

  
 Essene Chronology
550?: Codex Claromontanus (Dp): Greek/Latin Pauline Epistles + Canon of ~250ce lists 27NT+ Barnabas+ Hermas+ Acts of Paul+ Apocalypse of Peter; "Western" type.
450?: Syr(pal), Palestinian Syriac (Aramaic) Gospels, of "Caesarean" text-type.
340?: Eusebius of Caesarea, theologian and church historian, cites "Caesarean" NT text-type, wrote: "Ecclesiastical History"
www.essene.com /Church/EsseneChronology.htm   (7412 words)

  
 Text-Types and Textual Kinship
This has led Kurt Aland to propose that the "Western" text is not a legitimate text-type.
Westcott and Hort's text is based largely on the evidence of text-types, and remains the model New Testament text to this day (if it be noted that the UBS text has now supplanted WH, it should be noticed that UBS, like the texts of Bover and Merk, differs very little from WH).
The text printed by Westcott and Hort is, in almost all instances, the Neutral text (the so-called "Western Non-Interpolations" represent one of the few major exceptions).
www.skypoint.com /~waltzmn/TextTypes.html   (16332 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.