| |
| | WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION ... |
 | | In addition, Westfall advised Westinghouse that a recommendation would be made that it be held in default and, on June 13, 1989, the NYCTA advised Westinghouse that that had been formally effectuated. |
 | | On August 2, 1989, Westinghouse sued in the District Court of the Southern District of New York for breach and rescission of the contract. |
 | | Westinghouse appealed to the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, arguing that article 8.03 imposes a procedure for dispute resolution by a functionary inseparable from one of the parties to the dispute and, thus, fosters a predisposed adjudication process, which is contrary to New York public policy. |
| www.law.cornell.edu /ny/ctap/082_0047.htm (1934 words) |
|