Wikipedia:Blocking policy - Factbites
 Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Wikipedia:Blocking policy


    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.


Related Topics

In the News (Tue 17 Nov 09)

  
 What-Means.com:Administrators - What-Means.com
See wikipedia:blocking policy for more information on when blocks are appropriate and when they are not.
If you are granted access, we ask that you exercise care in using these functions, especially the ability to delete pages and their history, to delete images (which is permanent!), and the ability to block IP addresses.
Sometimes deletion is a technical matter, in which a redirection page has to be removed to make way for renaming an article, or a page whose history has been broken up has to be deleted and the pieces recombined.
www.what-means.com /encyclopedia/Admin   (1396 words)

  
 Policy violations (was [WikiEN-l] Re: Violation of blocking policy by user "40277")
Policy violations (was [WikiEN-l] Re: Violation of blocking policy by user "40277")
Articles should be written from a neutral point of view, representing differing views on a subject fairly and sympathetically." Texture and Oberiko were not fair or sympathetic toward my view, and enforced their own POV my removing my edit that had reduced the POV-ness (as others besides me have pointed out).
To clarify, I didn't mean a hard-and-fast rule-- of course some deletions are good and some additions are bad.
mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013804.html   (981 words)

  
 [WikiEN-l] Blocking policy
Enforceing it is not a change of policy.
mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikien-l/2004-July/014535.html   (183 words)

  
 Policy violations (was [WikiEN-l] Re: Violation of blocking policy by user "40277")
Articles should be written from a neutral point of view, representing differing views on a subject fairly and sympathetically." Texture and Oberiko were not fair or sympathetic toward my view, and enforced their own POV my removing my edit that had reduced the POV-ness (as others besides me have pointed out).
If the justification is presented in the Talk page, it's sufficient to write "See talk" in the edit summary box." ----- All of these were violated by Texture, Oberiko, and Jiang when they deleted my addition.
mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikien-l/2004-June/013804.html   (183 words)

  
 Talk:SandBox - CreativeCommons
If you force accounts, then range blocking (http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Range_blocks) becomes a useless feature as sysops won't know the IP of the person spamming, so wouldn't be able to range block it.
I'm all for open communications and free speech, believe me, but requiring accounts is not blocking anyone from anything, and ironically, relying on sysops to continually revert things can often be undemocratic.
They are by no means forced to allow anons to edit any more than they are expected to follow our deletion policy.
wiki.creativecommons.org /wiki/Talk:SandBox   (183 words)

  
 Re: [WikiEN-l] Re: Re: The whole point of wikipedia (Martin Richards)
But if we restrict IP editing - even if we restrict it in some way, like with this blocking policy proposal - we'll get a worse encyclopedia.
It's called wikinfo (http://www.wikinfo.org), and no IP editing is allowed.
You may ask him whether Wikinfo has signficant vandalism, but that's not the point: we're here to make a good encyclopedia as well.
www.archivum.info /wikien-l@wikipedia.org/2005-10/msg01146.html   (351 words)

  
 User talk:Mero - Simple English Wikipedia
Please note that the blocking policy requires sysops to set a working email address in their personal settings if they want to block users.
You might want to keep an eye on Vandalism in progress and the Proposed deletions pages.
Please make sure you read the policies before using your sysop abilities.
simple.wikipedia.org /wiki/User_talk:Mero   (120 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.