| | Freedom to Tinker » Blog Archive » Wikipedia Quality Check |
 | | So possible categorical omissions have to be kept always in mind when evaluating subjective rankings. |
| | Felten, the problem you state regarding the Microsoft case is endemic throughout pretty much all reporting of complicated issues, especially when using non-primary sources. |
| | On the other hand, I would suppose that if I were to edit the ‘Edward Felten’ entry to say, “Edward Felten is best known for his groundbreaking work on Java Security” (say) or “the SHRIMP project”, that articles on said topics would soon grow out of the dangling references. |
| www.freedom-to-tinker.com /archives/000674.html |
