Wikipedia:Perfect stub article - Factbites
 Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Wikipedia:Perfect stub article


    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.


  
 The perfect stub article - Wikipedia
I still think there needs to be some way in the article to acknowledge that the article is a less-than-perfect (or even a perfect) stub.
The other sort of acceptable "definition-only" article would be a pointer page, consisting of a list of several divergent senses of a word, each defined on the page, and each definition followed by a pointer to an article where the topic, in that sense, is discussed in more depth.
For biographies and articles about non-concepts (e.g., about countries and cities), definitions are impossible; so begin with a clear, helpful, informative description of the thing, e.g., what he person is famous for, where a place is and what known for, the basic details of an event and when it happened, etc.
nostalgia.wikipedia.org /wiki/The_perfect_stub_article   (876 words)

  
 Wikipedia Perfect stub article - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wait a few minutes, or check the deletion log.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia_Perfect_stub_article   (39 words)

  
 Wikipedia:The perfect stub article - Simple English Wikipedia
For articles or stubs about a person, tell what he or she is famous for.
Among the traditional proverbial suggestions about Wikidom, there is the idea that articles should not be "perfect" -- having a misspelled word or two draws a reader into correcting that article and being interested in adding more.
For biographies and articles about non-concepts (e.g., about countries and cities), definitions are impossible, so begin with a clear, helpful, informative description of the subject.
simple.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia:The_perfect_stub_article   (1123 words)

  
 Wikipedia talk: The perfect stub article - Open Encyclopedia
I still think there needs to be some way in the article to acknowledge that the article is a less-than-perfect (or even a perfect) stub.
The other sort of acceptable "definition-only" article would be a pointer page, consisting of a list of several divergent senses of a word, each defined on the page, and each definition followed by a pointer to an article where the topic, in that sense, is discussed in more depth.
I might write a page-long article and still call it a stub, because it's actually an outline of what needs to be a much longer article.
talk.open-encyclopedia.com /The_perfect_stub_article_oew   (941 words)

  
 Wikipedia:The perfect stub article/Test - Simple English Wikipedia
When you make or edit a "stub" article, think about what it can become, and that the article needs to grow to become better.
Many users look at the Newest Changes page, but if your stub goes off the screen before anyone makes a change, it helps to have a more long-term sign that more work needs to be done.
For articles about concrete things (e.g., about people, countries and cities), it isn't possible to define something, so begin with a clear, helpful, informative description of the subject.
simple.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia:The_perfect_stub_article/Test   (815 words)

  
 policy
cash, template:stub, endowment, permanent life insurance, wikipedia:find or fix a stub, death, wikipedia:perfect stub article, life insurance, year, policy
www.life-insurance-help.com /policy   (762 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.