Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: Wikipedia:Wikipetiquette

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Ads by Google

In the News (Tue 15 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

Wikipedia policy - Wikipedia (Most people here do not need this rule; they are naturally polite and helpful, most of the time.) Please see Wikipetiquette. nostalgia.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia_policy   (1407 words)

[Wikipedia-l] Re: Wikipedia moderators and moral authority That's interesting I thought the whole reason why we have been losing contributors is because we are /not/ enforcing our Wikipetiquette policy. The policies listed IMO should be; NPOV, no copyright violations, 'we are an encyclopedia' and yes Wikipetiquette. But users that show a clear pattern of violating policy should be "gasp" told they are doing so, told what the possible consequences are and if they ignore this warning then hard security takes over. mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-November/024895.html   (745 words)

Editing policy - Wikipedia Please see Wikipetiquette for some suggestions on how you can avoid overusing talk pages in this way. A point of terminology: the notion of refactoring, in the context of a wiki, means basically the rewriting of a page so as to preserve all the useful information on the page. nostalgia.wikipedia.org /wiki/Editing_policy   (1105 words)

Wikipetiquette/Talk - Wikipedia Is it just me, or does the Wikipetiquette page read like a page out of B. This page was last modified 04:45, 15 January 2005. If you can't support those goals, then go buy your own server. nostalgia.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipetiquette/Talk   (251 words)

Kids.net.au - Encyclopedia Wikipedia talk:Recentchanges - In particular, I would prefer to take out the links to Neutral point of view, Wikipetiquette and Copyrights, and just have the link to Policies and guidelines. The reasons for this is that few people actually need to read these policy pages. If anything I think there is a case for taking out some more links to free up some space. www.kids.net.au /encyclopedia-wiki/wi/Wikipedia_talk:Recentchanges   (2500 words)

[WikiEN-l] Re. Susan Mason, I'm not clear what the problem is Below are links to the archives with the relevant subject titles below the links - happy reading (you could have just as easily looked this up BTW - that is one reason why some people have been impatient with these types of questions): http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2002-November/subject.html 129.186.80.133 (aka Lir) lir collateral damage: Stop! mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikien-l/2003-March/002063.html   (638 words)

Wikipedia talk: No personal attacks - Open Encyclopedia I think we will work best if we avoid all unnecessary controversy, and if we must engage in controversy, that we practice wikipetiquette as far as we are able. talk.open-encyclopedia.com /No_personal_attacks_oew   (9746 words)

User:Larry Sanger/Final comments archive, maybe - TheBestLinks.com - Minnesota, Wikipedia/Our Replies to Our Critics, Wikipedia bugs, Wikipetiquette, ... I'd say instead that we could have a more prominent link to Wikipetiquette. I agree, a more prominent link to Wikipetiquette But y'know, telling people how to be polite doesn't make them much more polite. www.thebestlinks.com /User__3A__Larry_Sanger__2F__Final_comments_archive__2C___maybe-bp-redirect-v-no-ep-.html   (2397 words)

Wikipedia:Diskussionsseiten - Wikipedia Auch zu jeder Benutzerseite existiert eine Diskussionsseite und diese hat ein paar besondere Features. de.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia:Diskussionsseiten   (1189 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.