
	Where results make sense

Topic: Wikiquette

Related Topics

Mitzvot

Bron

MI5

Spyglass

William Oughtred

Chooser

Julian calendar

Verde River

Dragonfruit

Rambouillet

RealAudio

Sankranti

CISTI

IBM 9020

Hua Hin

In the News (Wed 16 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Wikiquette alerts are an option for a quick, streamlined way to get an outside view.
		Outsiders who visit the link are encouraged to make a constructive comment about any Wikiquette breaches they see.
		Image:Hazel O Leary fisher.jpg Improper removal of Copyvio tag (multiple; see history).
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts (740 words)

	Wikiquette - Suchergebnis zu Wikiquette - Definition zu Wikiquette - Wörterbuch der Bedeutung - www.mauspfeil.com (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
		Hy ner, was ist denn nun wenn man eine eindeutig falsche oder überholte "tatsache" in einem Beitrag findet dann sollte man ihn doch austauschen ohne rücksicht auf den Autor.
		Zum thema höflichkeit: hier der vorläufig abschließende abschnitt aus wikiquette.
		Der artikel Wikiquette ist wohl nicht sonderlich beliebt.
	www.mauspfeil.com /Wikiquette.html (1666 words)

	Gmane -- Mail To News And Back Again
		However, users are > generally expected to follow good practice similar to Wikiquette.
		That > is, users should assume good faith and be polite and constructive.
		Sounds sensible to me. > I know it's probably a bad thing making up policy like this, but as > I'm sure you'll agree, John, it's better to have some policy rather > than none at all, as you had been complaining.
	article.gmane.org /gmane.science.linguistics.wikipedia.english/23107 (219 words)

	Talk:Black hole - Information (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
		Plautus satire, seeing that no other challenges to the claim were forthcoming, attempted to delete his own edits into the thread, which subsequently was the site of a minor reversion skirmish which ended in the strategic withdrawl by Plautus satire.
		No known conflicts exist between this summary and the wikiquette guidelines, nor of any other guideline or rule that is commonly applied to all users.
		Further edits to this section are subject to summary deletion or summarization by Plautus satire, as per wikiquette guidelines.
	www.book-spot.co.uk /index.php/Talk:Black_hole (3416 words)

	Science Fair Projects - User:Eloquence/Comment policy
		This includes my comments, so you are technically allowed to do with them as you wish.
		However, in the interest of Wikiquette, I ask you to respect my comment policy.
		This primarily concerns editing and refactoring, so if you are not interested in that, please ignore the text below.
	www.all-science-fair-projects.com /science_fair_projects_encyclopedia/User:Eloquence/CP (756 words)

	Networking and Network Security (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
		I don't see this as situation as necessarily bad or redundant in a functional sense.
		That is, I think it's valuable to have 3 kinds of pages: 1) a succinct cheat-sheet that we can point people to from the Welcome page or in our personal greetings to new users, which I think is the purpose the Wikiquette page serves now.
		I can see what he's TRYING to say, but when you get into words like "right" and "wrong," you really are missing the point of NPOV.
	www.subnetworking.com /wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Wikiquette (2135 words)

	Squarks: An admittedly weak antithesis to Dvorak's wiki entropy notions (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
		Software (and at times humans) would test (and automatically moderate/rewrite/correct/question) articles so that they evolve in accordance with NPOV, wikiquette and other formal wiki guidelines.
		Say, for example you want a certain bias/filter in an article, the software would automatically rewrite the wiki article to show you that bias.
		(For example, in an extreme case, you might want to see the spam that's accumulated with the article or changes that aren't in strict accordance with wikiquette, or may want any given article to be rewritten on a phd level or 6th grade level).
	www.squarks.com /blog/2005/07/admittedly-weak-antithesis-to-dvoraks.htm (855 words)

	[WikiEN-l] Wikiquette "committee"
		But how much good > material has not been contributed because of his well documented > behavioral problems?
		In my opinion, we need to set clearer rules on > Wikiquette and be serious about enforcing them, with a well-defined > protocol of warning, temporary banning, permanent banning etc. Maybe there > could be a 5-10 member Wikiquette "committee" where violations could be > reported and decisions would be made by voting.
		By making it proprietary > (totally unwiki, but so is reporting directly to you) we can avoid having > the lists and talk pages cluttered up with these complaints and can make > sure that users will not have to fear repercussions for reporting > Wikiquette violations.
	mail.wikipedia.org /pipermail/wikien-l/2003-October/006928.html (477 words)

	ExaltedWiki: WelcomeToExaltedWiki (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
		It's easy to walk around the site and read, but the real fun of a wiki comes when you contribute.
		If you need help, QuickStartGuide and WhatIsAWiki both have valuable information and links to get you on the right track, and BestPractices will tell you how best to observe Wikiquette.
		Once you feel comfortable and have a UserPage, feel free to contribute!
	exalted.xi.co.nz /wiki/wiki.pl (1227 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)