| |
| | Sebeok's (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | In his explorations of the boundaries and margins of the science or “doctrine” of signs (as he also calls it), Sebeok opens the field to include zoosemiotics (a term he introduced in 1963), or, even more broadly biosemiotics, on the one hand, and endosemiotics (semiotics of sign systems such as the immunitary, the neuronal, cf. |
 | | Instead, semiotics after Sebeok is not only anthroposemiotics but also zoosemiotics, phytosemiotics, mycosemiotics, microsemiotics, machine semiotics, environmental semiotics and endosemiotics (the study of cybernetic systems inside the organic body on the ontogenetic and phylogenetic levels): and all this under the umbrella of biosemiotics or, increasingly now and in the future, just plain semiotics. |
 | | As evidenced by studies in zoosemiotics, signs do not belong exclusively to the human world and it may well be that the use of signs also implies the ability to lie (cf. |
| www.susanpetrilli.com /sebeok's.htm (7629 words) |
|