Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Adversarial process


Related Topics

In the News (Thu 24 Dec 09)

  
  Adversarial system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The adversarial system (or adversary system) of law is the system of law, generally adopted in common law countries, that relies on the skill of the different advocates representing their party's positions and not on some neutral party, usually the judge, trying to ascertain the truth of the case.
In an adversary system, there is no more controversy and the case proceeds to sentencing; though in many jurisdictions the defendant must have allocution of her or his crime, a false confession will not be accepted even in common law courts.
Some writers trace the adversarial process to the medieval mode of trial by combat, in which some litigants, notably women, were allowed a champion to represent them.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Adversary_system   (1676 words)

  
 Adversarial process - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is adversarial as the opposing attorneys are competing to convince the judge to include or exclude evidence or witnesses, and competing to convince the judge or jury of the guilt or innocence of the defendant, and severity of the impact of the actions (if guilty) on the plaintiff or victim.
Lawyers differ on whether the process should be seen as strictly adversarial, in order to ensure they retain the trust of clients and the overall process retains the trust of society, or whether the ethics of the larger society should play a role in their behavior, e.g.
Some view the wikipedia as an adversarial process, since alternating edits to an article are often seeking to balance what is seen (by each author in turn) as an extreme point of view.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Adversarial_process   (766 words)

  
 Adversary system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
In a way the rules of evidence can function to give a judge limited inquisitorial powers as the judge may exclude evidence she believes is not trustworthy or irrelevant to the legal issue at hand.
This allows for plea bargaining in adversary systems in a way that is difficult or impossible in inquisitional system, and most felony cases in the United States are handled without trial through such plea bargains.
Because the adversarial system assumes that the evidence is to be presented to layman rather than to jurists, the rules of evidence are considerably more strict.
www.marylandheights.us /project/wikipedia/index.php/Adversary_system   (1709 words)

  
 Adversarial system Article, Adversarialsystem Information   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
The adversarial system (or adversary system) of law is the system of law, generally adoptedin common law countries, that relies on the skill of the different advocates representing their party's positions and not on some neutral party, usually the judge, trying to ascertain the truth of the case.
In an adversary system, there is no more controversy and the case proceed to sentencing; though inmany jurisdictions the defendant must have allocution of her or his crime, a falseconfession will not be accepted even in common law courts.
They point out that most cases adversarial systems are actuallyresolved by plea bargain, and that most legal cases in these systems do notgo to trial, and argue that this can lead to great injustice when the defendant has an unskilled or overworked attorney, which islikely to be the case when the defendant is poor.
www.anoca.org /systems/evidence/adversarial_system.html   (1328 words)

  
 Adversarial process -- Facts, Info, and Encyclopedia article   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
However, they are less well studied in (The study of government of states and other political units) political science and (The branch of social science that deals with the production and distribution and consumption of goods and services and their management) economics.
Some view the (Click link for more info and facts about wikipedia) wikipedia as an adversarial process, since alternating edits to an article are often seeking to balance what is seen (by each author in turn) as an extreme point of view.
The idea of inherently assumes that such adversaries will eventually converge to some kind of agreement, more or less the same assumption as is made in supply-demand curves in (The branch of social science that deals with the production and distribution and consumption of goods and services and their management) economics.
www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/a/ad/adversarial_process.htm   (868 words)

  
 Collaborative Divorce Lawyers Association - A Network of Connecticut Attorneys   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Although the traditional adversarial litigation model works well in some areas of the law, "zealous advocacy" can produce profound detrimental side effects in family law cases.
Collaborative divorce is a process through which the parties and their individual attorneys commit themselves to resolving all issues of the divorce by negotiated agreement without resorting, or threatening to resort, to costly court proceedings.
In the event that the collaborative process is unable to resolve all the issues in dispute between the parties, agreements reached during the collaboration can be preserved, and litigation can focus on the remaining issue or issues, limited and defined by the less expensive collaborative process.
collaborative-divorce.com   (1193 words)

  
 [No title]
Full funding of the legal process, with more judges and shorter dockets, will not fundamentally transform the public's poor opinion of the adversarial process.
Some will be quick to cite the noble history of the adversarial process and its many contributions to society, especially in the creation and enforcement of individual rights and liberties.
Yet regardless of whether you think the adversarial system will always be with us, or whether you see a day when progress brings us better ways of resolving all disputes, the historical successes of the adversarial system do not justify its one-size-fits-all monopoly on dispute resolution.
www.wsba.org /media/publications/barnews/2004/feb-04-lehto.htm   (1186 words)

  
 The Future of Children - Sub-Sections
The adversarial process for divorce has been subject to major criticisms because it has been thought of as creating antagonists.
The mediation process facilitates the effectuation of a formal agreement in a relatively informal atmosphere using a presumed neutral third party as mediator.
Mediation may be a more humane process than an adversarial proceeding and, in some instances, may be better able to discover and address the emotional issues that may be having a negative effect on resolving practical legal problems.
futureofchildren.org /information2827/information_show.htm?doc_id=75542   (1516 words)

  
 [No title]
The term `adversarial' connotes a competitive battle between foes or contestants[40] and is popularly associated with partisan and unfair litigation tactics.
the adversarial process is likely to encourage an adversarial culture and to degenerate into an environment in which the litigation process is too often seen as a battlefield where no rules apply.
Adversaries `sometimes do bring into court evidence which, in a dispassionate inquiry, might be overlooked': J Frank Courts on trial: Myth and reality in American justice Princeton University Press Princeton 1949, 80.
www1.worldbank.org /publicsector/legal/AdversarialNonadversarialdebate.doc   (2035 words)

  
 Garrison Klueck - Law and Mediation Offices of Garrison Klueck
The process is adversarial and often each party strives to get "at least a little bit more than half" of the community estate.
Due to the adversarial nature of the proceedings, a fully-litigated divorce is generally the most financially expensive.
Additionally, parties often observe that mediation saves money and stress because the nature of the mediation process eliminates a lot of discovery disputes and sort of "cuts to the chase." Mediation tends to quickly focus on the true areas of dispute between the parties and attempts to rapidly resolve those areas of dispute.
www.familylawsandiego.com /divorce_choice.html   (1227 words)

  
 Comparison of Mediation and Adversarial
In a contested case, the divorce process is long and often takes a least one year.
In most cases the mediation process is quicker than the adversarial, as mediators generally meet with the couple frequently and there is no communication lag.
A mediated settlement is less costly than settlement through the adversarial process and certainly compared to contested litigation.
www.divorcemediation.norwalk.ct.us /comparison_of_mediation_and_adversarial.htm   (419 words)

  
 Dialectical processes
Debating is an adversarial process: each debater carefully selects information and presents it to argue for a particular position.
A third family of processes is often regarded as part of the consensual family.
It differs from both adversarial and consensual processes in that it avoids the defensive behaviours of fight and flight.
www.scu.edu.au /schools/gcm/ar/arp/dialectic.html   (1173 words)

  
 Collaborative law takes a foothold in Florida
Family lawyers in several circuits are promising their clients to stay out of court, making the entire process better for the attorneys, the court system, the clients, and, most importantly, any children involved.
Both collaborative law and cooperative divorce are spreading rapidly across the state as more and more attorneys tout the merits of these non-adversarial methods and more and more clients learn the benefits of working together to stay out of court.
Keeping the children out of the process is a definite plus, and when couples will be sharing custody of their children, it’s best that their relationship is not completely destroyed, Roth added.
www.floridabar.org /DIVCOM/JN/JNNews01.nsf/76d28aa8f2ee03e185256aa9005d8d9a/5240b584e80a60e485256b2800517e7a?OpenDocument&NAVCLOSE   (1616 words)

  
 Center for Professional Responsibility - American Bar Association   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
The trial process, which serves as the center piece of motion and negotiation practice, is fixed upon the determination of a winner.
And, as we explore the different processes, a consequence is a modification of role of the lawyer and corresponding revisions in professional obligations.
If, however, these distinct processes are to survive as truly different paradigms such that we still have an alternative to provide to clients, then we must ensure that the conduct is consistent with the goals and objectives of such processes.
www.abanet.org /cpr/kovach.html   (1222 words)

  
 Notes
This is in contrast to adversarial divorce, where men are significantly more dissatisfied than women with the process and outcome.
Researchers have not noted a statistical difference in the treatment of child support payments, although mediating fathers are more likely to agree to pay for “extras” for their children and are more likely to agree to help with college expenses.
The couples who mediated and the couples who completed the adversarial process had similar levels of marital conflict and tension reported in the two years prior to separation.
www.divorceinfo.com /doesmediationworknotes.htm   (1217 words)

  
 SSRN-Harnessing Adversarial Process: Proof Burdens, Affirmative Defenses, and Optimal Complementarities in Litigation ...   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
The game theoretic structure of adversarial process generally dictates that one party "strategically complements" - "advancing" in response to her opponent's advance, "retreating" in response to his retreat - while the other "strategically substitutes" - advancing on her retreating opponent, retreating from his advance.
Specifically, litigation should generally be structured so that the "incentive target" complements while her adversary substitutes.
Sanchirico, Chris William, "Harnessing Adversarial Process: Proof Burdens, Affirmative Defenses, and Optimal Complementarities in Litigation" (February 2005).
papers.ssrn.com /sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=661166   (410 words)

  
 DIVORCE HQ - Collaborative Negotiation: A New Approach To Family Law
He thought the adversarial system was tearing his clients apart and he did not want to be part of such a system.
Without such agreements, the process would be considered a cooperative divorce as opposed to the total commitment of good faith negotiation.
The process controls the pacing of the case rather than being driven by a court calendar or statutes.
www.divorcehq.com /articles/collabnegotiation.html   (1604 words)

  
 [No title]
The grievance process is designed to address and resolve problems, not to be an adversarial process.
An employee must initiate the grievance process within 10 days of the action or occurrence being grieved; or within 10 days after the employee has knowledge of, or reasonably should have knowledge of, the action or occurrence.
The process is completed upon issuance of a final agency decision, which must be in writing and issued within 30 days of the initiation of the grievance process.
www.dot.state.co.us /EEO/Rule8-8.htm   (512 words)

  
 Oregon Divorce Attorney - Resources + Library - Books and Articles
Even though the popular media (Yahoo!News, for example) generally ignored this point and highlighted other aspects of her findings, Kelly was quite explicit in discussing the importance and the demonstrated benefits of such non-adversarial interventions as divorce mediation and skill-building programs for parents.
When parents were randomly assigned to a mediation or adversarial process, those in the "mediation" group were significantly more likely to reach agreement prior to a court hearing than those in the adversarial group.
Parents who exhibit these skills, or start developing them, at the beginning of the divorce process are most likely to come up with a plan that will benefit their children, and they are more likely to make the plan work once it's down on paper.
www.oregondivorceattorney.com /parentcoaching.html   (820 words)

  
 Jean Munroe Civil and Family Mediation Training - TN Supreme Court Approved
Mediation is a process of conflict resolution in which an impartial third party assists persons in dispute make informed decisions in an effort to resolve their differences.
The process is goal-oriented in that the purpose is to reach an agreement which promotes a sense of respect, fairness, privacy, mutual concern, and a genuine understanding of collaborative conflict resolution.
Although some divorces must be litigated, the process often inhibits a long term agreement, because of the psychological and financial damage incurred by the parties.
www.jeanmunroe.com /mediation   (732 words)

  
 Collaborative Family Lawyers - About Us
Many of us in the family law bar (and many family law judges, as well) have long recognized the need for a system that would permit our clients to effectively resolve their divorce issues without having to subject themselves to the traumatic adversarial process on which our court system is based.
The adversarial process in divorce cases is something that most clients experience as a hostile, wounding battle and an extreme invasion of privacy, a system which rewards the person who is most willing to fight and to attempt to injure the other even though the fight is also self-destructive.
They gain much in the process, not the least of which is a settlement that they and their former spouse have designed for themselves and which they have both endorsed as being appropriate for each of them.
www.collaborativefamilylawyers.com /about.shtml   (629 words)

  
 V. NON-ADVERSARIAL CASE RESOLUTION   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
The adversarial system is, however, essential and well-suited to resolving conflicts when differences regarding the true facts of a child abuse or neglect case, or the differing views of the proper response to a family's child protection-related problems, are irreconcilable.
Family and juvenile courts recognize that the adversarial process in child abuse and neglect cases can sometimes break down communications and create hostility, divisiveness, and rigid position-taking between participants, most notably between the parents and the child protective agency and/or the child's attorney.
To assure that all parties consider it an objective process, mediators should be independent of the child welfare agency or the judge, even though the child welfare and court system must coordinate in the execution of these processes to ensure NACR is effectively implemented.
www.acf.dhhs.gov /programs/cb/publications/adopt02/02adpt5.htm   (5813 words)

  
 The Divorce Mediation Process
Mediation diverts the parties from the adversarial process entirely and is truly consistent with the stated policy of the law.
Mediation is a voluntary, confidential and cooperative problem-solving process in which the parties to a dispute meet with an impartial and neutral facilitator who assists them in communicating their primary concerns, first to the mediator and eventually to each other.
To determine if both parties are open to the process, assuming that neither party rejects the idea out of hand, they may arrange to consult with a mediator simply to explore that issue.
www.themediator.com /divorce.htm   (1848 words)

  
 evidentiary : alchemy: Adversarial Process   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
These biological processes led to questions about nerves and cells, which led me to nutrition, and back to the strange foods grandma cooked in her rural house - right on the edge of several farms.
If an educator wants to study the effectiveness of a particular teaching style, and she does so by measuring standardized test scores, she has already revealed at least two biases: that standardized scores reflect learning, and that higher test scores are a worthwhile goal.
Since we are using legal process metaphorically and not literally, I did not write the memory in question-answer form.
www.forensicwriter.com /evidentiary/adversarial_process   (12887 words)

  
 Turn Down the Volume When it Comes to Divorce
There are three paths to divorce: the conventional adversarial process, a mediated settlement, or a collaborative approach to the process.
The divorce process, an experience faced by thousands of couples and their children, is a particularly revealing cultural phenomenon.
In fact, each spouse in the mediation process should consider obtaining the advice of an attorney before and during mediation sessions and before signing the final settlement agreement.
www.mediate.com /articles/stark.cfm   (633 words)

  
 Definitions of Divorce or Civil Mediation by San Diego Mediator Jane Schooler   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Civil mediation is a process whereby the parties to a dispute negotiate an agreement.
If the mediation process is successful, paperwork is filed with the court, but neither party has to appear.
Participants have more control over the process and over the final results because it is a non-adversarial process and because they are active participants in the process.
www.janeschooler.com /aboutmed.php   (343 words)

  
 Jewish Law - Articles ("Divorce Mediation: Gentle Alternative to a Bitter Process")   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Mediation is not an isolated process, but one which seeks guidance from outside attorneys, therapists and rabbis to inform couples of their rights and responsibilities as parents and separating couples.
From a Jewish perspective, both in a halachic and a philosophic sense, mediation is an ideal process of conflict resolution.
Even if peace is not easy, even in the midst of disagreement, even if we may not love or like a person as we used to, peace should still be the goal to which to aspire and pursue.
www.jlaw.com /Articles/berner.html   (1745 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.