| |
| | Paul, Laissez Faire in Nineteenth-Century Britain, Fact or Myth?: Library of Economics and Liberty |
 | | With few exceptions, the Classical economists' deviations from pure laissez faire are praised as examples of their pragmatism, rather than condemned as departures from sound public policy. |
 | | While the Classical economists tolerated, and indeed encouraged, repeated governmental interventions to cure perceived social and economic ills, noninterventionism remained, to a greater or lesser extent depending upon the quirks of each particular economist, the regnant principle, and any departures from it required elaborate justification. |
 | | If the Classical economists' attitudes towards state intervention into the economy are to be rightly understood, we must delve beneath the surface of their various stands on such salient issues of their time as the poor laws and the factory acts to the more fundamental level of their metaphysical and moral presuppositions. |
| www.econlib.org /LIBRARY/Essays/LtrLbrty/fplLNB1.html (6055 words) |
|